Grab
Bag. What do you think is enclosed in its contents?
Email Us.

02/09/04
-- Frankie LaMonicka from Brooklyn, New York writes...
Tony
Knuckles is inside the friggin' bag. If you Sam, or you Bill
says anything about it...It's CURTAINS. Freakin' Hot Male nonsense.
02/03/04
-- Henrietta from Harvard Square, MA says...
There
most certainly is some mushy stuff inside this. And thank you
Dr. Zizmor...Hey maybe Dr. Zizmor is in the GRAB BAG!
01/18/04
-- We get this response from Mabel T. from Osh-Kosh, Indiana...
What
i think is in the grab bag is another grab bag that may or may
not contain yet another grab bag which is half the size of the
original grab bag therefore indicating that the intermediate
grab bag would have to be 66-85% larger than the third grab
bag and yet perhaps the original grab bag contains no further
grab bags whatsoever in which case its contents and possibly
its contents contents contain nothing at all and further, in
this cyber-spectacle of grab bags one has to inquire about the
ontological existence of said initial grab bag to begin with
wherein subsequent grab bags would certainly not exist unless
this first grab bag is in fact an inner grab bag which means
that it is the contents of an even larger grab bag but one that
cannot be seen or even fit on the screen whereby it is only
logical to assume that the larger grab bag of the on-screen
grab bag contains it and everything else since it cannot be
seen and hence we ourselves our in said grab bag and this one
that we see only reminds us of this staggering truth but as
far as grab bags go it is no more staggering than viewing a
grab bag that, quite frankly, does not exist.
Thanks
ya Mabel!
Keep
em commin'. We are hot-modelling in Lima, Peru but will get
to the rest of the responses as soon as I take off this Warren
thong.